Everything will be a chatbot by 2035
Chatbots used to be hard. And expensive. You needed a full team of engineers — backend developers, NLP specialists, linguists, content editors, data collectors. Some of these projects even pushed the boundaries of linguistic research — that's how deep the rabbit hole went.
Voice assistants? Even worse. If you wanted to add voice on top of a regular chatbot, the costs skyrocketed. Text-to-speech and speech-to-text are each full of internal complexity and overlapping sub-problems. Off-the-shelf solutions, even for English, were often overpriced and underwhelming. Tried building your own? Triple the cost, minimum.
From personal experience: I once spent a full day mapping out the logic of a single component of a voice assistant. One component. The assistant had multiple subsystems like that, just inside the dialogue engine. It took teams of engineers — literal floors of people — to ship the product.
Today, the game has changed completely. A single developer can now build a working prototype in one evening after reading a blog post on Medium. Three APIs — one for STT, one for a large language model, one for TTS — and you're in business. Or skip coding altogether and use a no-code tool where it's all pre-built. Yes, maintaining and scaling that bot is still work — but testing your idea? Easy.
The quality leap is ridiculous. Competing with ElevenLabs in voice generation is only realistic if your entire company is focused on speech tech. If you're building a product and just want a natural-sounding voice — don't reinvent the wheel. You'll spend more and get worse results.
Today, my bot's entire logic fits in a config file you can scroll through in three screens. The first working version was created with four prompts — the last of which generated ten more prompts that basically wrote the code for me. Amazon used to publish whole papers explaining how they handled intent detection, fuzzy entity matching, and everything in between. Today? It's three API calls and a config file.
Prototyping and testing ideas is cheaper and faster than ever. You don't just write ideas on a whiteboard over the weekend — you build them and show them to real users. This levels the playing field for startups and small teams.
Some companies still insist on building everything in-house. I've seen a few examples — and they all ended the same way: wasted months, wasted budgets, and last-minute plan overhauls. Most of the time, it's just engineers using the project to experiment with shiny new tech on the company's dime. Think twice before going down that road.
Sometimes, more expensive means cheaper. Using powerful APIs and battle-tested LLMs might cost more to run — but the quality saves you from endless fixes and support tickets. Cheap local setups often turn into painful, expensive rebuilds.
The chatbot market boom backs this up. Stats don't lie: the chatbot industry has exploded in the past few years. Whether it's sales, support, or internal automation — if you're not using bots, your competitors probably are.
Marketing and sales, though, got harder. From personal experience: it's noticeably more difficult to get attention and convert leads today than it was 3–4 years ago. The market is crowded. Customers are skeptical. The bar is higher.
Bottom line: either you start using bots now — or watch your competitors pull ahead. This isn't "innovation" anymore. It's just standard business infrastructure.
👉 Oh, and by the way — at Zirius AI, we build these bots. Want to see what we can do? Just head to ziriusai.xyz.